![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I collected a list of Bad Science links over the first part of last year to use for the ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
arisia panel "The Year in Bad Science". I fully expected the Science track to accept the suggestion for the panel, as the previous year's "Bad Science in 2011" was very popular and enthusiastically received.
Alas, it was not accepted. Nor was it rejected. It appears to have been dropped on the floor. I will be more diligent this year in getting the panel onto the schedule (or find out why they don't want it).
But feel free to examine 2012's list and comment there (or here).
(I already know that the list is incomplete; I expected to back-research some of the bigger election-year howlers. But if you think I missed something important, please let me know.)
arisia panel "The Year in Bad Science". I fully expected the Science track to accept the suggestion for the panel, as the previous year's "Bad Science in 2011" was very popular and enthusiastically received.Alas, it was not accepted. Nor was it rejected. It appears to have been dropped on the floor. I will be more diligent this year in getting the panel onto the schedule (or find out why they don't want it).
But feel free to examine 2012's list and comment there (or here).
(I already know that the list is incomplete; I expected to back-research some of the bigger election-year howlers. But if you think I missed something important, please let me know.)
